Answer: Slavery’s history stretched back to antiquity. Prior to the American Revolution, nearly everyone in the world accepted it as a natural part of life. English colonies north and south relied on enslaved workers who grew tobacco, harvested indigo and sugar, and worked in ports. They generated tremendous wealth for the British crown. That wealth and luxury fostered seemingly limitless opportunities, and inspired seemingly boundless imaginations. Enslaved workers also helped give rise to revolutionary new ideals, ideals that in time became the ideological foundations of the sectional crisis. English political theorists, in particular, began to re-think natural law justifications for slavery. They rejected the longstanding idea that slavery was a condition that naturally suited some people. A new transatlantic antislavery movement began to argue that freedom was the natural condition of man.
Explanation:
According to the passage, African Americans
could not be slaveholders, enslaved persons, or citizens
Answer:
citizens
Explanation:
Answer:
Citizens
Explanation:
Why was the Soviet Union opposed to America's UN atomic energy proposal?
Answer:
it permitted the united states to maintain a small stockpile of bomb
PLZZ HELP ME!!!!!!!!
What was a challenge to U.S. forces in the Vietnam War?
a shortage of soldiers
lack of a defined front
lack of modern weaponry
a shortage of supplies
Answer:
I beleive it is number 2, it could also be number 4 but less likley
Explanation:
the US at that point had the most modern technology and 2.7million us soldiers fought
Answer:
Lack of a defined front
Explanation:
Which of the following statements is true of participation in U.S. government? It’s important to vote because everyone working in government is elected. The president needs to work for the government, not the people. Judges have to follow laws rather than serve the needs of the people. All U.S. officials and citizens have a duty to participate in government.
The true statement of participation in U.S. government is that all U.S. officials and citizens have a duty to participate in government.
Participation in U.S. government is the civic duty of all U.S. officials and citizens. Democracy in the United States is founded on the principle of representative government, which means that officials are chosen by the people and must represent the people's interests.
The president, Congress, and the courts make up the federal government, and all three branches have their own responsibilities and constraints. The people elect the president and members of Congress to represent their interests and govern on their behalf.
Judges, on the other hand, are responsible for upholding the law and interpreting it in a fair and impartial manner rather than representing the needs of the people. Hence, All U.S. officials and citizens have a duty to participate in government is the statement that is true of participation in U.S. government.
For more such questions on government
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ8
How did the cotton gin affect slaves?
The cotton gin increased cotton productivity which increased profits for farmers. The increase in profits led to the demand for more slaves to help plant and harvest the cotton. The slaves were no longer needed in the removal of seeds from cotton but were needed in increase numbers for planting and harvesting.
Make me a rap with the words archipelago deity forge polytheism revelry sacrifice trident underworld
i aint a rapper sorry man.
What is the benefit of civic virtue and philanthropy? A. free publicity B. tax write off C. uplifting the community
Answer:
Uplifting the community
Explanation:
Philanthropic actions and Civic virtue may be regarded to as a set of behavior or actions which are geared towards helping, assisting and ensuring that people within their jurisdiction are offered a certain level of assistance, support from oppression and other means of assistance which could be helpful to lower Cadre within the community. The presence of individuals who Harbour this characteristics is often to vital to the growth and development of the community or society as they often promote their ideals without waiting for assistance from the government as they are only focused on the betterment and growth of those around them.
I will give BRAINLIEST to the correct answer!! Under President Andrew Johnson’s Reconstruction plan, which of the following was true?
A. State governments in the former Confederacy were made up of Radical Republicans.
B. Southern states were governed much as they were before the Civil War.
C. Freed slaves in the South were granted citizenship rights.
D. Plantation owners from the South were not given pardons.
Answer:
b.Southern states were governed much as they were before the Civil War.
The Reconstruction plan which is true by president Andrew Johnson is they released slaves in the south and provide rights of citizenship to them.
What was the President's reconstructional plan?The Reconstruction plan given by President Andrew Johnson stated that white people of the south will gain control over things by getting freedom from slavery. There will be no place for black people in politics.
According to this plan, voting rights were provided to white people and reconstruction will be done as the southern states were destroyed completely in the war.
Therefore, option C moving slaves to freedom will be true regarding the reconstruction plan.
Learn more about the Reconstruction plan, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11736488
#SPJ2
Find the value of the variable.
36
g
16
1
28
9 =
31
Explanation:
im not positive but that might be it
Why do many still today question whether or not Vietnam was worth it?
Answer:
Many people question that topic since it was a CIVIL war. The country was fighting between itself. The U.S basically barged in and helped the side it thought was better. So many people died during that war. Many people believe that if Southern vietnam wasn't controlled by the U.S during that war and if the U.S had just stayed out of it then so many people would still be alive. On the other hand many believe the exact opposite. I hope I helped. Pls mark brainliest:)
Which statement best explains why tension grew between European leaders over colonialism in Africa? A. Some believed th...
Answer:
Some were angered because other nations took over their colonies.
Explanation:
Growing resentment between several European countries with the rise of Imperialism brought the rush to invasion, conquest and annexation of African territory. Many European nations captured other territories in Africa. The Berlin Conference in 1885 helped the European powers in the colonization of Africa. The motive behind colonialism in Africa was the acquisition of resources. These include people, labour, minerals, and land. Europeans establish their colonies in the wilderness to get natural resource and rich minerals to prosper their nations.
Which challenge of globalization has been greatly assured by international jet travel
Answer:
Globalisation Process is been a universal force. Factors contributing to globalization include market, production, culture, labour, technology, environment and regulation. Globalization provides huge potential profits to companies and nations.
Air travel is a large and growing industry. Economic growth, world trade, international investment and tourism is been facilitated by Airline Industry.
Various improvements regarding the air travel both commercial including government and private airlines have grown. Introduction of a few airlines from Boeing like Boeing 747 have increased the capacity of passengers to carry and have made it affordable for people to travel with luxury and comfort. Improvements and contribution from government has increased the development of resorts and infrastructure to attract lure tourists from the prosperous countries in Western Europe and North America.
Match these terms with the proper definitions.
1. refusal to accept the government's authority
initiative
2. citizens vote on legislator's bill
recall
3.
accept government's authority but disagreeing with political
decision
referendum
4. jeopardize a term of office
dissent
5. citizens legislate
alienation
What Country was Changed by World War 2?
Answer:
Germany was changed by world War r
HISTORY OF THE HOLOCAUST
PLEASE HELP!!
How does Mandela
use parallelism and opposition to make his final appeal?
A. By offering to die for his beliefs
B. By incriminating both blacks and whites
C. In explaining how important his vision is to him
D. In demonstrating the dangers of all forms of
authoritarianism
Parallelism is a rhetorical device used by Nelson Mandela.Use examples from the text to illustrate the point of his speech.
What was Nelson Mandela's speech about glory and hope for?
Nelson Mandela's goal is to educate others about the future of South Africa and the struggles that the country faces now that he is president. Nelson's goal is to inspire others to fight for equal rights.
Why did he include nature-related references in his speech?
Refer to the text for evidence.His audience consists of South Africans.His goal is to show how united the people are, and he's using a metaphor to compare the people's deep attachment to the country to the natural world.
Learn more about Nelson Mandela here:
https://brainly.com/question/26741033
#SPJ1
can any body send no so that I can learn how to ppt with voiceovers
During the panic of 1837 was the what time in history of the u.s that congress passed a federal bankruptcy law.
Answers...
Fourth?
First?
Second?
Third?
You love April 06, 1830 outlawed immigrants from the United States to Texas what finding from the mirror y terán report cuse the law
Answer:
The General Mier y Terán Report concluded that the increase of immigration from the United States to Texas was a threat to keeping Texas in the Mexican federation.
Explanation:
His recommendation was to ban immigration from the United States to Texas because it could lead Americans living in Mexico, who tended to isolate themselves from Mexican culture and people, to acquire too much power. Therefore, the law of April 6, 1830, banned immigration from the U.S. to Texas and imposed strong restrictions on trade.
Answer:
American colonists had outnumbered Mexican settlers.
Explanation:
True or false ? Only European countries were practicing imperialism in order to build their empires. (Please explain if it’s false)
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Only European countries were practicing imperialism in order to build their empires
Where did Czar Nicholas I exile suspected dissenters?
the Ural Mountains
Siberia
the Crimea
Taiwan
Answer:
Siberia.
Explanation:
Tsar Nicholas, I was the emperor or Tsar of Russia from 1825 to 1885 despite lacking any leadership skills. He also ensured that there is a strict policy of repression, be it in the educational sector, publishing, or even other areas of public life. He exercised extreme censorship in the life of the people, posing secret agents or spies among the people to maintain fear among them.
Due to his extreme hold over the people, there came numerous dissenting voices, some asking for the end of his rule. This led the Tsar to exile those dissenters. One among such dissenters was Taras Shevchenko, who was exiled to Siberia after the poet wrote a poem about the Tsar and his wife, and his policies.
Thus, the correct answer is Siberia.
Native American tribes for thousands of years and arriving European colonists who settled in this area hundreds of years ago relied on an abundance of
which of the following natural resources? Select all that apply.
A: Fertile soil rich in nutrients for growing wheat (to make flour), tobacco, and crops
B: Wood harvested from forests
C: Gold and other minerals from deep mines
D: Abundant populations of fish, oysters, and fur-bearing mammals.
E: Access to freshwater (rivers and groundwater)
Answer:
The answer is given below
Explanation:
Considering the Native American tribes for thousands of years and arriving European colonists who settled in this area hundreds of years ago relied on an abundance of the following natural resources.
A. Fertile soil rich in nutrients for growing wheat, tobacco, and crop
B: Wood harvested from forests
D: Abundant populations of fish, oysters, and fur-bearing mammals.
"In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianismSchool officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are "persons" under our Constitution. They are possessed of fundamental rights .... In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views." Based on this reasoningthe U.S. Supreme Court concluded that
Answer:
Based on this reasoning, the US Supreme Court concluded that students cannot be prohibited from expressing their opinions and making political protests, even within the school.
Explanation:
The text presented above shows the position of the US Supreme Court in favor of students' freedom of expression and the right to peacefully disagree and protest against the government. This happened after two students were banned from staying at school while wearing black bands on their arms, which symbolized a protest against the Vietnam War.
The Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to prohibit students from protesting peacefully against the government, since the students were also American citizens guaranteed by the first constitutional amendment.
why is julius caesar famous?
Can someone correct me to think it’s b
Answer:
B is correct.
Explanation:
Election frequency and military use is something constitutional, so it cannot be changed. The responsibilities are also set in stone, so the use of the constitution would be the answer. There are debates often between Democrats and Republicans over what is constitutional or not.
GIVING BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!
-if you answer correctly ill give you brainliest which will give you 30pts-
Answer: C
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is (A)
Explanation:
Well the only thing america didn’t want is for communism to spread to other neighboring countries as it will affect trade, wars, and border disputes. Cause if all fall under one dictator, if that dictator wants to fight, everyone has to fight. Thats the main reason why as the US wanted to assert control and its influence and not some little country that can be pushed around.
How could the alliance become problematic in the future
Answer:
Moral hazard is encouraged by US security guarantees, in which an individual takes a greater risk because someone else bears the cost. Allies may become complacent in dealing with rivals when they are protected by the world's most powerful military.Even non-allies are susceptible to the phenomenon if they believe they have anything like a security promise from the US, as Georgia and Russia did in 2008. Using NATO to assist Ukraine today could yield similar results. Another example is Saudi Arabia's recent adventurism. Via moral hazard, alliances may cause instability among neighbors, dragging the US into wars it unintentionally encouraged. This issue would be mitigated if allies were more worried about losing US defense.
Please answer LIKE PLEASEEEEEEE
Answer:
D, B, A, C
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure, but if I am wrong I am very very sorry..
(24 points) GIVING BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS CORRECTLY!!!!!
in your own words (no plagiarism) Describe The Battle of Appomattox Court House, including people present for the surrender.
Answer:
The Battle was one of the last battles of the Civil War and took place on the morning of April 9, 1865, in Appomattox County Virginia. General Lee, on the side of the south, surrendered to General Grant, on the North.
Explanation:
Prior to his resignation what did he attempt to use as a way to prevent his impeachment?
O The fifth amendment right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself
O The executive privelage
O A presidential pardon to prevent charges against him for his involvement in Watergate
O Incriminating his Vice-President to ensure he was not blamed for Watergate
Answer:
The self-incrimination clause provides various protections against self-incrimination, including the right of an individual to not serve as a witness in a criminal case in which they are the ...