what is this y=
[tex] \frac{3}{2}x+3 [/tex]
the y=-3​

Answer:

1.7 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

7.9 - 6.2= 1.7

Answer:

2,1,0 is the sequence of its terms

Step-by-step explanation:

Bigger -smaller

hope it is helpful to you

Answer:

Ok so first he bought the road and pancakes with means he speant 134.85 dollars which mean he out himself in the negatives after he bought the his items

Answer: [tex]\dfrac{1}{52}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

We need to choose 6 of clubs that's also a red

A deck contains 13 cards of clubs, and 6 of clubs is the only red card i.e. favorable outcome is 1 out of 52 cards

Probability is the ratio of favorable to the total outcomes

[tex]\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{1}{52}[/tex]

Answer:

Here, the test statistics ( 20.951 ) is greater than the critical value ( 7.815 )

Therefore, we reject H₀ at 0.05 level of significance.

Hence, there is significant evidence to support the claim that In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is NOT like that of all U.S household

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Number of vehicle owned                 Number of households

0                                                             20

1                                                              35

2                                                             23

3 or more                                               22

Total ( n )                                               100

so

Null hypothesis           H₀ : In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is like that of all U.S household

Alternative hypothesis Hₐ : In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is NOT like that of all U.S household

Also given that, ∝ = 0.05

Now, we compute the test statistics;

x² = ∑[ ( O[tex]_i[/tex] - E[tex]_i[/tex] ) / E[tex]_i[/tex] ]

where E[tex]_i[/tex] is expected frequency and O[tex]_i[/tex] is observed frequency.

so we make our table for chi square test statistics

No. of                 O[tex]_i[/tex]            P                E[tex]_i[/tex]            (O[tex]_i[/tex] - E[tex]_i[/tex])²             (O[tex]_i[/tex] - E[tex]_i[/tex])²/E[tex]_i[/tex]

Vehicle                                              (n×P)

owned

0                        20         0.087          8.7            127.69                 14.677

1                         35         0.331           33.1            3.61                     0.109

2                        23         0.381           38.1           228.01                 5.985

3 or more          22         0.201          20.1           3.61                      0.180

Total                  100                           100                                        20.951

hence, x² = 20.951

Now, degree of freedom df = k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3

From Chi-Square critical value table; ( right tailed test ) for ∝ = 0.05

[tex]x_{0.05, 3[/tex] = 7.815

Decision Rule

Reject H₀ if x² is greater than xₐ².

Here, the test statistics ( 20.951 ) is greater than the critical value ( 7.815 )

Therefore, we reject H₀ at 0.05 level of significance.

Hence, there is significant evidence to support the claim that In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is NOT like that of all U.S household

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

D beause less then 5 that means it gose down the grid

Answer:

/_ 12 is the angle of depression from the firefighter to the second story window.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps!

#CarryOnLearning

Answer:

2nd option is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \angle 12[/tex] is the angle of depression from the second story window to the firefighter.

Answer:

It is closer to 1

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 is 1/4 away from 1, whereas 0 is 3/4 away from 3/4. So, 1 is closer.

The fraction 3/4 is closer to 1.

We have,

To determine whether the fraction 3/4 is closer to 0 or 1, we can compare the distances between 3/4 and 0, and between 3/4 and 1.

The distance between 3/4 and 0 is 3/4.

The absolute value of the difference is |3/4 - 0| = 3/4.

The distance between 3/4 and 1 is 1 - 3/4 = 1/4.

Since the distance between 3/4 and 1/4 (which is 1/4) is smaller than the distance between 3/4 and 0 (which is 3/4), we can conclude that 3/4 is closer to 1 than to 0.

In other words, if we were to plot the fractions 0, 3/4, and 1 on a number line, the distance between 3/4 and 1 would be smaller than the distance between 3/4 and 0.

Therefore,

The fraction 3/4 is closer to 1.

Learn more about fractions here:

https://brainly.com/question/24370499

#SPJ2

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

=============================================================

Explanation:

Multiply out those values mentioned to get the final answer: 3*3*2 = 9*2 = 18.

There are 18 different outfit combos.

---------------

Further explanation (optional section):

Let's say we only worried about the sweaters and shoes, and for now there's only one color for the skirt. We have 3 colors for the sweaters and 2 for the shoes. Imagine a table with 3 rows and 2 columns. Each row is a different color for the sweater and each column is a different color for the shoe. There are 3*2 = 6 cells inside the table. Each cell is a different outfit.

For instance, we could have R = red sweater and G = gold shoe. Then that means RG = red sweater + gold shoe outfit. So we'd have RG as one of the cells of this 6 cell table.

Now imagine that we laid out a table that is 6 by 3. The 6 is from the 6 outfits calculated earlier, and the 3 is now accounting for the colors of the skirts. We'd then have 6*3 = 18 combos total. Again, each cell inside the table represents a different outfit combo.

Answer:

i got B for my answer

Step-by-step explanation:

work is on the paper for you, somthing that might help you with your future with math is PEMDAS always do exponents first when it's an equation like your first, second, and third question. I hope this helped.

Answers on edg. are:

log2 8

log3 27

log10 1,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Yo just trust me ight

Answer:

y=MX+B

Step-by-step explanation:

the 4 you will put it on the y axis and you'll go down 1 since it's negative and 5 times to the right since it's positive

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Weight before 18 month = 18 pound

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Current weight of dog = 14 pound

Weight lose each month = 2/9 pound

Total number of month = [tex]1\frac{1}{2}[/tex] year = 18 month

Find:

Weight before 18 month

Computation:

Total weight lose = Weight lose each month x Total number of month

Total weight lose = 2/9 x 18

Total weight lose = 4 pound

Weight before 18 month = Current weight of dog + Total weight lose

Weight before 18 month = 14 + 4

Weight before 18 month = 18 pound

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = -9 (as you know)

Step-by-step explanation:

  [tex]\log_6\dfrac{1}{6}=\dfrac{x}{9}\\\\\log_6{(6^{-1})}=\dfrac{x}{9}\\\\-1=\dfrac{x}{9}\\\\x=(-1)(9)=\boxed{-9}[/tex]

_____

I find it helpful to remember that a logarithm is an exponent.

  [tex]\log_a(a^b)=b[/tex]

Answer:

The slope of these coordinates is 0.

It is a horizontal line.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.

mean= 84.6

median=84

mode=84

2.

mean=10.14

median=9

mode=9

3.

mean=22.3

median=21

mode=phi

Step-by-step explanation:

mean: the sum of of the quantities by their number

median: the median value after rearranging the values

mode: the value that occurs most frequently

in the second question

mean = (8+9+9+9+9+10+11+15)/8

median(even number) =(9+9)/2=9

mode=9

Answer:

for data set 1

1.mean-84.6

2.median-(84+84)/2 = 84

3.mode-84

for data set 2

1.mean-9.25

2.median-(9+9)/2 = 9

3.mode-9

for data set 3

1.mean-22.3

2.median-21

3.mode-no mode with this data set

hope this helped!!

Answer:

55 students

Step-by-step explanation:

all you do is 220*.25 and you get the answer

C.) 6x^2-5x+10/x(x-2)

Answer:

150°

Step-by-step explanation:

We know each angle in a equilateral triangle is 60° and that of a rectangle is 90° . So ,

[tex]\implies \angle ABC = \angle DBC + \angle ABD \\\\\implies \angle ABC = 90^o + 60^o \\\\\implies \boxed{\boxed{ \angle ABC = 150^o }}[/tex]

Answer: c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is d because it's reflects

Answer:

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = 0.30[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]White = 40[/tex]

[tex]Green = 24[/tex]

[tex]Red = 12[/tex]

[tex]Yellow = 24[/tex]

[tex]Blue = 20[/tex]

Required

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red)[/tex]

The total numbe of candy is:

[tex]Total = 40 + 24 + 12 + 24 + 20[/tex]

[tex]Total = 120[/tex]

This probability is calculated as:

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = P(Green) + P(Red)[/tex]

For each, we have:

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{Green}{Total} + \frac{Red}{Total}[/tex]

Take LCM

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{Green+Red}{Total}[/tex]

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{24+12}{120}[/tex]

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{36}{120}[/tex]

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = 0.30[/tex]

Answer:

a. 135 g

b. 60.6 min

Step-by-step explanation:

a. What mass of Cu(s) is electroplated by running 28.5 A of current through a Cu2+ (aq) solution for 4.00 h? Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.

The chemical equation for the reaction is given below

Cu²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ → Cu(s)

We find the number of moles of Cu that are deposited from

nF = It where n = number of moles of electrons, F = Faraday's constant = 96485 C/mol, I = current = 28.5 A and t = time = 4.00 h = 4.00 × 60 min/h × 60 s/min = ‭14,400‬ s

So, n = It/F = 28.5 A × ‭14,400‬ s/96485 C/mol = ‭410,400‬ C/96485 C/mol = 4.254 mol

Since 2 moles of electrons deposits 1 mol of Cu, then 4.254 mol of electrons deposits 4.254 mol × 1 mol of Cu/2 mol = 2.127 mol of Cu

Now, number of moles of Cu = n' = m/M where m = mass of copper and M = molar mass of Cu = 63.546 g/mol

So, m = n'M

= 2.127 mol × 63.546 g/mol

= 135.15 g

≅ 135 g to 3 significant figures

b. How many minutes will it take to electroplate 37.1 g of gold by running 5.00 A of current through a solution of Au+(aq)?

The chemical equation for the reaction is given below

Au⁺(aq) + e⁻ → Au(s)

We need to find the number of moles of Au in 37.1 g

So, number of moles of Au = n = m/M where m = mass of gold = 37.1 g and M = molar mass of Au = 196.97 g/mol

So, n = m/M = 37.1 g/196.97 g/mol = 0.188 mol

Since 1 mol of Au is deposited  by 1 moles of electrons, then 0.188 mol of Au deposits 0.188 mol of Au × 1 mol of electrons/1 mol of Au = 0.188 mol of electrons

We find the time it takes to deposit 0.188 mol of electrons that are deposited from

nF = It where n = number of moles of electrons, F = Faraday's constant = 96485 C/mol, I = current = 5.00 A and t = time

So, t = nF/It

= 0.188 mol × 96485 C/mol ÷ 5.00 A

= ‭18173.30‬ C/5.00 A

= 3634.66 s

= 3634.66 s × 1min/60 s

= 60.58 min

≅ 60.6 min to 3 significant figures