There is a bag with only red marbles and blue marbles.
The probability of randomly choosing a blue marble is
3/8
There are 56 marbles in total in the bag and each is equally likely to be chosen.
Work out how many red marbles there must be.

Answer:

The first one: 0=-3x-5+x²

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to rearrange the equation to identify the coffecients on the quadratic.

Answer:

First one.

Step-by-step explanation:

Put in standard form. Highest exponent to lowest to constant.

[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 3x - 5 = 0

a[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - bx - c = 0

Answer:

Cir = d[tex]\pi[/tex]

C = 15[tex]\pi[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Exact Answer: 15π inches

Decimal Answer: 47.1 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The unit is inches because circumference is one dimension.

1.) Circumference Formula: 2πr or dπ⇒d=diamater ⇒r=radius

2.) dπ=15π

3.) 15 × 3.14⇒approximate answer

Answer:

(9-3)+18÷8

=6+ 9/4

Step-by-step explanation:

.............

Answer:

8.25

Step-by-step explanation:

(9-3) + 18 ÷ 8

6 + 18 ÷ 8

6 + 2.25

8.25

I hope it helps ^_^

Answer: 6(1,2,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

x = 3, x = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

When solving this problem, keep the general format of a logarithm in mind:

[tex]b^x=y\\log_b(y)=x[/tex]

Where, (b) represents the base, (x) is the exponent, and (y) is the evalutaor. Please note that others might use slightly different terminotoly than what is used in this answer.

One is given the following expression, and is asked to solve for the parameter (x);

[tex]log_5(x-4)=1-log_5(x-8)[/tex]

First, manipulate the exquestion such that all of the logarithmic expressions are on one side. Use inverse operations to do this.

[tex](log_5(x-4))+(log_5(x-8))=1[/tex]

Now use the Logarithmic Base Change rule to simplify. The Logarithmic Base Change rule states the following;

[tex]log_b(x)=\frac{log(x)}{log(b)}[/tex]

Remember, if no base is indicated in a logarithm, then the logarithm's base is (10). Apply the Logarithmic Base Change rule to this problem;

[tex]\frac{log(x-4)}{log(5)}+\frac{log(x-8)}{log(5)}=1[/tex]

Now remove the denominator. Multiply all terms in the equation by the least common denominator; ([tex]log(5)[/tex]) to remove it from the denominator on the left side.

[tex](\frac{log(x-4)}{log(5)}+\frac{log(x-8)}{log(5)}=1)*(log(5))[/tex]

[tex]log(x-4)+log(x-8)=log(5)[/tex]

All logarithms have the same base, the left side of the equation has the addition of logarithms. This means that one can apply the Logarithm product rule. The logarithm product rules the following;

[tex]log_b(x*y)=(log_b(x))+(log_b(y))[/tex]

This rule can be applied in reverse to simplify the left side of the equation. Rather than rewriting the product of logarithms as two separate logarithms being added, one can rewrite it as one logarithm getting multiplied.

[tex]log(x-4)+log(x-8)=log(5)[/tex]

[tex]log((x-4)(x-8))=log(5)[/tex]

Now used inverse operations to bring all of the terms onto one side of the equation:

[tex]log((x-4)(x-8))=log(5)[/tex]

[tex]log((x-4)(x-8))-log(5)=0[/tex]

Similar to the Logarithm product rule, the Logarithm quotient rule states the following;

[tex]log_b(x/y)=(log_b(x))-(log_b(y))[/tex]

One can apply this rule in reverse here to simplify the logarithms on the left side:

[tex]log((x-4)(x-8))-log(5)=0[/tex]

[tex]log(\frac{(x-4)(x-8)}{5})=0[/tex]

The final step in solving this equation is to use the Logarithm of (1) property. This property states the following:

[tex]log_b(1)=0[/tex]

When applying this property here, one can conclude that the evaluator must be equal to (1), therefore, the following statements can be made.

[tex]log(\frac{(x-4)(x-8)}{5})=0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(x-4)(x-8)}{5}=1[/tex]

Inverse operations,

[tex]\frac{(x-4)(x-8)}{5}=1[/tex]

[tex](x-4)(x-8)=5[/tex]

[tex](x-4)(x-8)-5=0[/tex]

Simplify,

[tex](x-4)(x-8)-5=0[/tex]

[tex]x^2-12x+32-5=0[/tex]

[tex]x^2-12x+27=0[/tex]

Factor, rewrite the quadratic expression as the product of two linear expressions, such that when the linear expressions are multiplied, the result is the quadratic expression:

[tex]x^2-12x+27=0[/tex]

[tex](x-3)(x-9)=0[/tex]

Now use the zero product property to solve. The zero product property states that any number times (0) equals (0).

[tex]x=3,x=9[/tex]

Hello,

I suppose the question is solve for x.

[tex]\displaystyle log_5\ (a)=\dfrac{ln (a)}{ln (5)} \\\\log_5(x-4)=1-log_5(x-8)\\\\\dfrac{ln(x-4)}{ln(5)} =1- \dfrac{ln(x-8)}{ln(5)}\\\\ln(x-4)=ln(5)-ln(x-8)\\\\ln(x-4)+ln(x+8)=ln(5)\\\\ln((x-4)*(x-8))=ln(5)\\\\(x-4)*(x-8)=5\\\\x^2-12x+27=0\\\\\Delta=12^2-4*27=36=6^2\\\\x=9\ or\ x=3\\\\Sol=\{3,9\}\\[/tex]

For Moderators,

this is a mathematical resolution without any bla-bla sentences that you will easily find. (I can not do it sorry)

Answer:

cost per serving can be used as a result of using your head to think

Answer:

94.2 square units.

I got 94.09 but that seems to be the closer answer.

Product is multiplication.

First multiply 0.7 by 2:

0.7 x 2 = 1.4

Because there is only one number to the left of the decimal point the scientific notation remains the same 10^4

The answer is 1.4 x 10^4

Answer:

29°

Step-by-step explanation:

cos x = 84/98

x = cos-1(84/98)

x = 28.9

Answer:

40 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

The 100 degree angle is supplementary to angle CED. This means CED will end up being 80 degrees. Since the angles in all triangles equate to 180 degrees 80 + 60 + angle D must equal 180 degrees. Therefore, angle D has to be 40 degrees.

Answer:

30 years old

Step-by-step explanation:

If marina is one sixth of her mom age, and she is five years old. The multiply five times size to get her moms full age.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let,

Age of her mom be = x

Age of Marlena

[tex] = \frac{1}{6} x[/tex]

We know that,

Age of Marlena is 5 years

Therefore,

By the problem,

[tex] = > \frac{1}{6} x = 5[/tex]

=> x = 5 × 6

=> x = 30

Hence,

Age of her mother is 30 years (Ans)

Answer:

12 nickels and 9 dimes

Step-by-step explanation:

1/ We have: n + d = 21 <=> d = 21 - n or opposite (n = 21 - d)

2/ We have: 0.05n + 0.10d = 1.50 and then we will put 1/ into 2/

=> 0.05n + 0.10(21 - n) = 1.50

=> 0.05n + 2.1 - 0.1n = 1.5

=> -0.05n = -0.6

=> n = 12

Nevertheless, d = 21 - n = 21 - 12 = 9

Hello,

Using Thalès 's theorem:

Let's h the height of the monument.

[tex]\dfrac{1}{h} =\dfrac{4.5}{78} \\\\h=\dfrac{78}{4.5} =\dfrac{156}{9} \approx{17.3\ (ft)}[/tex]

If you don't know what is the Thalès's theorem,

imagine that the similar triangles.

Answer:

The three-person trip require more effort (row harder) than the two person-trip

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of persons in the boat determines the mass of the boat

The mass of the boat with three people in total is more than the mass of the boat with only two person's

Mass is a measure of inertia, which is the resistance of a body to accelerate, and therefore, to the application of a force

Therefore, on the three-person trip were three people are in the boat, the boat has more mass, and therefore more inertia and will require more effort (force) than on the two-person trip that has a lesser mass

Answer:

z = 83 / (- c + 6 - t)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

-cz+ 6z = tz + 83

z=?​

-cz+ 6z = tz + 83

Collect like terms

-cz+ 6z - tz = 83

Factorize

z(- c + 6 - t) = 83

Divide both sides by (- c + 6 - t)

z(- c + 6 - t) / (- c + 6 - t) = 83 / (- c + 6 - t)

z = 83 / (- c + 6 - t)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

b. remains unchanged

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula for standard error of mean is;

SE = σ/√n

From the above, we can see that the standard error of mean is independent of the confidence coefficient as it doesn't affect the SE.

Now, we are given that;

random sample; n = 100

Standard deviation; σ = 1

Thus;

SE = 1/√100

SE = 1/10

Now, even if the confidence coefficient is reduced, we can see that it has no impact on the standard error of mean.

Thus, SE remains unchanged.

Answer:

p = 11           q = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

      2p - 3q = 13

-      p - 3q = 2

p = 11

p - 3q = 2​

(11) - 3q = 2

-3q = -9

q = 3

Answer:

p=11 q=3

Step-by-step explanation:

subtract second from first

2p-3q=13

-p+3q=-2

p=11

plug in

11-3q=2

-3q=-9

q=3

Answer:

Let's define the high temperature as T.

We know that:

"four times T, was more than 2*T plus 66°C"

(i assume that the temperature is in °C)

We can write this inequality as:

4*T > 2*T + 66°C

Now we just need to solve this for T.

subtracting 2*T in both sides, we get:

4*T - 2*T > 2*T + 66°C - 2*T

2*T > 66°C

Now we can divide both sides by 2:

2*T/2 > 66°C/2

T > 33°C

So T was larger than 33°C

Notice that T = 33°C is not a solution of the inequality, then we should use the symbol ( for the set notation.

Then the range of possible temperatures is:

(33°C, ...)

Where we do not have an upper limit, so we could write this as:

(33°C, ∞°C)

(ignoring the fact that ∞°C is something impossible because it means infinite energy, but for the given problem it works)

Answer:

Gradient of A: 2

Gradient of B: -1

Step-by-step explanation:

Gradient = change in y/change in x

✔️Gradient of A using two points on line A, (2, 5) and (0, 1):

Gradient = (1 - 5)/(0 - 2) = -4/-2

Simplify

Gradient of A = 2

✔️Gradient of B using two points on line B, (0, 5) and (5, 0):

Gradient = (0 - 5)/(5 - 0) = -5/5

Simplify

Gradient of B = -1

Answer:

i don't see anything so i cant help you sorry

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

From given, we have,

Paul says he is 16 inches shorter than 1 1/2 times Theresa's height.  

Steve says he's 6 inches shorter than 1 1/3 times Theresa's height.

Let the height of Theresa be "x" inches.

So, we get,

For Paul, 1 1/2 x - 16 = T

⇒ 3/2 x - 16 = T ......(1)

For Steve, 1 1/3 x - 6 = T

⇒ 4/3 x - 6 = T .........(2)

equating  equations (1) and (2), we get,

3/2 x - 16 =  4/3 x - 6

6 - 16 = 4/3 x - 3/2 x

-10 = (8 - 9)/6 x

-60 = -x

x = 60 inches.

Therefore, Theresa is 60 inches tall.

Answer:

Answer: The arc PS would be a minor arc · Step-by-step explanation: As a minor arc is one that is less that 180 degrees, it would be the only viable ...

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

5(x-5)=353 + x

the first 5 is all his tests, in the parenthesis x is the average score, and -5 is the 5 points lower mentioned in the problem.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Markus scored 85, 92, 82, and 94 on his first four tests and x on his fifth.

We know that his score on the fifth test is five points lower than the average of all five tests.

To find the average, we add up all the values and divide by the number of values there are. Therefore, the average of all five tests is:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{85+92+82+94+x}{5}[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]\displaystyle =\frac{353+x}{5}[/tex]

His test score x is five points lower than the average. Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle x=\left(\frac{353+x}{5}\right)-5[/tex]

Rewrite. We can add five to both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle x+5=\frac{353+x}{5}[/tex]

And multiply both sides by five. Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle 5(x+5)=353+x[/tex]

Thus, our answer is B.

Notes:

By solving the equation, we see that x = 82. So, Markus scored 82 points on his fifth test.

If that is true, then his average score of all fives tests will be:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{85+92+82+94+82}{5}=87[/tex]

82 is indeed five points fewer than 87, so our answer is correct and matches the given information.

Answer:

both are equal is 0

Step-by-step explanation:

After substituting, the answer is 0 to both

Step-by-step explanation:

8.4 is the ans

4x+8y=40

4x + 6.4=40

4x=40-6.4

4x=33.6

x=33.6÷4

x=8.4

Answer:

4x+8y=40

4x+(8+0.8)=40

4x+6.4=40

4x+6.4-6.4 =40-6.4

4x=33.6

4x÷4=33.6÷4

X=8.4

Answer:

a=1

b=-5

c=6

Step-by-step explanation:

ax^2+bx+c=0

Is the formula used for this question.

The given function is the same as y = 1x^2 + (-5x) + 6

Compare it to the form y = ax^2+bx+c, and we have the following:

a = 1

b = -5

c = 6

Answer:

The last table (the bottom one)

Step-by-step explanation:

The ingredients having the same ratio means that, for every number of servings, we should have:

Y/X = constant.

So, for the first table when we have 1 serving, the quotient is:

Y/X = 2/1 = 2

when we have two servings:

Y/X = 3/2 = 1.5

The ratios are different.

Then this is not the correct option.

For the second table, when we have 1 serving the ratio is:

Y/X = 2/1 = 2

when we have two servings:

Y/X = 4/2 = 2

when we have 3 servings:

Y/X = 8/3 = 2.66

This is not the correct option.

For the third table:

1 serving:

Y/X = 2/1 = 2

2 sevings

Y/X = 3/2 = 1.5

This is not the correct option.

fourth table:

1 serving:

Y/X = 2/1 = 2

2 servings

Y/X = 4/2 = 2

3 servings

Y/X = 8/4 = 2

Here we can see that the ratio is always the same, then the ratio remains constant.

This is the table that shows a possible ratio for ingredients X and Y,