someone please help i beg!! 20 points

Answer:

C. demonstrate that their interpretations are both accurate.

Explanation:

When drafting an argumentative essay, a historian denies possible counterclaims to answer to arguments that could scrutinize his or her argument.

An argumentative essay is a kind of essay that performs arguments about both parties of a problem.

Counterargument introduces to an argument which contradicts earlier arguments and make the original position more accurate.

The composition of an argumentative essays incorporates: foundation, body, counterargument and a summing-up.

Answer:

The argument Scott used was that because he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal, he could never again be an enslaved person. He did have reason to believe he would win because this was a doctrine that was recognized in common law for centuries in Europe.

Scott said he could never again be an enslaved person since he had lived in a region where slavery was prohibited.

He had a good reason to think he would prevail because this approach has been upheld in European common law for many years. If Scott wasn't a citizen of the United States, he couldn't file a lawsuit in federal court, and the case would have been improperly granted.

Dred Scott Case in Missouri, 1846–1857. The United States Supreme Court supported slavery in American territory, rejected the legitimacy of black citizenship in the country, and ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional in its 1857 ruling, which shocked the whole country.

Learn more about the Dred Scott decision here:

https://brainly.com/question/23987166

#SPJ4

Answer: It’s D.

Explanation:

It’s D because, the other answer choices were what the anti-federalists thought.

Answer:

I think it is a because central gov can repress the state so option a

Answer:

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state's own constitution).

Answer:

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution (as opposed to the state's own constitution).

If you didn't or don't vote your fine, it isn't required by law for people to vote but it is pushed so then you know that you have a say in your countries ruling(This is only for the USA i don't really know other countries laws)

Answer:

I think it's b.)

Explanation:

In 1933, Hitler came to power and turned Germany into a dictatorship.

Dictatorship - most common form of authoritarian government in which unlimited power

Answer:

Sorry no answers...

Explanation:

Answer:

paid taxes

Explanation:

in the picture i see that Ohio is light green so the qualifications say that it is taxpaying men who could vote

Answer:

C. The amount of economic activity done with France and Britain would make it necessary for the U.S. to join the war effort.

Explanation:

C seems more probable but economics is the main reason the US joined in WW1 in 1917. The other options don't make sense according to the graph.  

Answer:

Their slaves would have not been freed

Explanation:

because they aren’t part of the rebellion anymore that’s why he gave them a second chance.

The answer for this one is

"touching the earth"

I was on edj

Protecting innocent life from harm should be the main justification for going to war and recovering stolen property. punishing those who have committed crimes.

War is commonly understood to be an aggressive confrontation involving states or countries. Various factors can cause nations to engage in war. It has been stated that a country will engage in war if it believes the gains of war exceed the drawbacks and in the absence of an alternative.

Wars that are undertaken to halt the rise of a morally reprehensible power are justified even though they are eradicating an evil that might eventually bring misery to a larger population. War for self-defense can indeed be justified against since doing so leaves you open to attack.

Learn more about war, Here:

https://brainly.com/question/3445478

#SPJ1

Answer:

United States of America and Mexican Republic

Explanation:

Explanation:

It is because, the residence act which placed the capital distinct in present day Washington DC was part of the plan by the federal government to appease all the pro-slavery regions.

Answer:

Monarchy

Explanation:

KING Triton

The official definition of a Monarchy is:

A form of government with a monarch at the head.

Monarch means:

A sovereign head of state, especially a king, queen, or emperor.

I think that will do as an explanation.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

8

Explanation:

Answer:

B.) He established more than 20 missions, where he lived and worked with American Indians.

Explanation:

Answer:

I am just as stumped as you are

Explanation:

That is really hard

Answer

tourism

Explanation:

Answer:

144 because of the turning point

Answer: Georgia Platform, statement of qualified support for the U.S. Union among Georgia conservatives following the Compromise of 1850. Drawn up by Charles J. Jenkins and adopted by a state convention on Dec. 10, 1850, at Milledgeville, the Georgia Platform consisted of a set of resolutions accepting the Compromise of 1850.

Explanation:

Answer:

I wrote ALOT sorry.

Explanation:

On March 5, 1770, a group of colonists—mostly youths and dockworkers—surrounded some soldiers in front

of the State House. Soon, the two groups

began trading insults, shouting at each

other and even throwing snowballs.

As the crowd grew larger, the soldiers

began to fear for their safety. Thinking

they were about to be attacked, the soldiers fired into the crowd. Five people,

including Crispus Attucks, were killed.

The people of Boston were outraged

at what came to be known as the Boston

Massacre. In the weeks that followed, the

colonies were flooded with anti-British

propaganda in newspapers, pamphlets,

and political posters. Attucks and the

four victims were depicted as heroes

who had given their lives for the cause

of freedom. The British soldiers, on the other hand, were portrayed as evil

and menacing villains.

At the same time, the soldiers who had fired the shots were arrested and

charged with murder. John Adams John Adams, a lawyer and cousin of Samuel Adams,

agreed to defend the soldiers in court. Many people criticized Adams and

some even threatened to harm the lawyer. But Adams believed that everyone—including the British soldiers—was entitled to a fair trial. Although

Adams supported the colonists’ cause, he wanted to demonstrate that everyone was subject to the rule of law.

Adams argued that the soldiers had acted in self-defense. The jury agreed

and acquitted the soldiers. To many colonists, however, the Boston Massacre

would stand as a symbol of British tyranny in the colonies.

In April 1770, Parliament repealed the Townshend Acts. Once again, the

colonial boycott had worked—British trade had been hurt and Parliament

had backed down. But Parliament kept the tea tax to show that it still had

the right to tax the colonists.

The Tea Act Increases Anger To demonstrate their displeasure with the

remaining tax on tea, many colonists chose not to purchase luxuries from

British merchants. Instead, they drank tea that was smuggled from Holland.

As a result, many British tea companies lost money in America as their tea

went unsold and rotted in ports.

Answer:

The colonists showed their discontent by dumping tea boxes into the water during the Boston Tea Party.  

Explanation:

The colonists didn't want to be taxed on tea.

Answer:

The Effects of the Columbian Exchange It was the year 1492, and a man by the name of Christopher Columbus set sail from Spain where he then landed in the present day Americas, sparking one of the most important events in the world, the Columbian exchange. The Columbian exchange has shaped the world to what it is today with the exchange of goods from the Old World to the New World, and vice versa. The Columbian exchange caused numerous short and long-term effects in the Americas and many other parts of the world. The short-term effects of the Columbian exchange included the outbreak of disease, which led to a sudden drop in the population of the indigenous peoples. In the beginning of the sixteenth century Spanish and Portuguese…show more content…

The foods that were brought back to the Old World such as, potatoes and corn proved a vital and necessary resource to the Europeans. Another short-term effect of the Columbian exchange was the migration of African slaves to the Americas. The majority of the Africans that were enslaved were caught in village raids or were war captives. They were caught by other Africans and sold to the European slave traders for money and other prized possessions. For slaves, the voyage known as the Middle Passage was a terrifying and perilous journey, with a death rate potentially as high as 50%. The long-term effects of the Columbian exchange included the swap of food, crops, and animals between the New World and Old World, and the start of the transoceanic trade. In order to produce a profit, Portuguese explorers were the first to established sugar cane plantations in Brazil. They then sold this crop to the Old World where it was a popular commodity because it provided Europeans with a sweetener for foods. In addition, European produce was brought to the New World, including “…wheat, vines, horses, cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and chickens… Where they sharply increased supplies of food and animal energy.” This fusion of crops between the Old and New World became fundamental in enhancing the diets and food of both populations.

Answer:

Explanation: Trump supports believe There’s a decent case to be made that President Trump committed extortion in his telephone call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger asking that 11,780 votes be added to his side of the ledger long after Georgia’s votes have been

Answer: A

Explanation:

Answer:

Eastern Orthodox

Explanation:

Answer:

D is the answer for sure

Explanation:

I just did it on a p e x

Answer: Yes, Feudalism in the Middle Ages brought stability to much of Europe in around 1000 B.C.

The economic and political system that developed in Europe during the Middle Age in which people pledged loyalty to a lord in return for protection.

Explanation:

Hope this helps! I’m not sure if the question is asking for your opinion or if it’s just how it’s laid out, so I shared my opinion above :)

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

house of reps: population

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The Great Compromise created two legislative bodies in Congress. ... According to the Great Compromise, there would be two national legislatures in a bicameral Congress. Members of the House of Representatives would be allocated according to each state's population and elected by the people.