Question 8
Which property justifies the fact that 5(x - 2) is equivalent to 5x - 10?
commutative
associative
O distributive

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Cross-multiply and solve for x:

Correct choice is C

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

work is on the paper for you, somthing that might help you with your future with math is PEMDAS always do exponents first when it's an equation like your first, second, and third question. I hope this helped.

Answer:

8.88 square mm

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for solving a triangle is base multiplied by height divided by 2 or 1/2(b)(h)

So by plugging in what you have, you'll get 1/2(4.8)(3.7) as your equation. 4.8(3.7) = 17.76 which simplifies your equation to 1/2(17.76) or 17.76/2.

17.76/2 = 8.88

So, the area of the triangle is 8.88 square millimeters.

Answer:

no correlation

Step-by-step explanation:

it shows no trend or a line thing

also i think your pic is upside down haha

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]here \: is \: your \: soution \\ \\ (1 \div 4) \times 28 \\ \\ 28 \div 4 = 7 \\ \\ 7 \: is \: your \: answer \\ \\ hope \: it \: help[/tex]

Answer: 36%

Step-by-step explanation: A simple way to figure out is to do 32/50 times 2. This makes it 64/100. 100 minus 64 is 36 which is the percent on how much free throws she mised

Step-by-step explanation:

Bigger -smaller

hope it is helpful to you

Answer:

378

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a is the answer my aunt told me she is a teacher

Answer:

-7/3

Step-by-step explanation:

You take two ( X,Y) points and subtract them to find the slope of the line.

23-16/-6-(-3) = -7/3

Answer:

/_ 12 is the angle of depression from the firefighter to the second story window.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps!

#CarryOnLearning

Answer:

2nd option is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \angle 12[/tex] is the angle of depression from the second story window to the firefighter.

Answer:

55 students

Step-by-step explanation:

all you do is 220*.25 and you get the answer

Answer:

Yellow = 18 spools of ribbon

Blue = 15 spools of ribbon

Bobby will have 3 more spools of yellow ribbon.

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

CHOOSE 1 GOVERNOR

CHOOSE 1 LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

CHOOSE 1 STATE HOUSE REP'.

CHOOSE 1 SENATOR

     =4 DIFFERENTNT WAYS.

Answers on edg. are:

log2 8

log3 27

log10 1,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Yo just trust me ight

Answer: c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x= 3/2 after u like simplify

Step-by-step explanation:

1 Add 44 to both sides.

8x=8+4

8x=8+4

2 Simplify  8+48+4  to  1212.

8x=12

8x=12

3 Divide both sides by 88.

x=\frac{12}{8}

x=

8

12

​

4 Simplify  \frac{12}{8}

8

12

​

  to  \frac{3}{2}

2

3

​

.

x=\frac{3}{2}

x=

2

3

​

Answer: [tex]\dfrac{1}{52}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

We need to choose 6 of clubs that's also a red

A deck contains 13 cards of clubs, and 6 of clubs is the only red card i.e. favorable outcome is 1 out of 52 cards

Probability is the ratio of favorable to the total outcomes

[tex]\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{1}{52}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = 0.30[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]White = 40[/tex]

[tex]Green = 24[/tex]

[tex]Red = 12[/tex]

[tex]Yellow = 24[/tex]

[tex]Blue = 20[/tex]

Required

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red)[/tex]

The total numbe of candy is:

[tex]Total = 40 + 24 + 12 + 24 + 20[/tex]

[tex]Total = 120[/tex]

This probability is calculated as:

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = P(Green) + P(Red)[/tex]

For each, we have:

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{Green}{Total} + \frac{Red}{Total}[/tex]

Take LCM

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{Green+Red}{Total}[/tex]

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{24+12}{120}[/tex]

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = \frac{36}{120}[/tex]

[tex]P(Green\ or\ Red) = 0.30[/tex]

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

=============================================================

Explanation:

Multiply out those values mentioned to get the final answer: 3*3*2 = 9*2 = 18.

There are 18 different outfit combos.

---------------

Further explanation (optional section):

Let's say we only worried about the sweaters and shoes, and for now there's only one color for the skirt. We have 3 colors for the sweaters and 2 for the shoes. Imagine a table with 3 rows and 2 columns. Each row is a different color for the sweater and each column is a different color for the shoe. There are 3*2 = 6 cells inside the table. Each cell is a different outfit.

For instance, we could have R = red sweater and G = gold shoe. Then that means RG = red sweater + gold shoe outfit. So we'd have RG as one of the cells of this 6 cell table.

Now imagine that we laid out a table that is 6 by 3. The 6 is from the 6 outfits calculated earlier, and the 3 is now accounting for the colors of the skirts. We'd then have 6*3 = 18 combos total. Again, each cell inside the table represents a different outfit combo.

Answer:

−2x 2−2+2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Here, the test statistics ( 20.951 ) is greater than the critical value ( 7.815 )

Therefore, we reject H₀ at 0.05 level of significance.

Hence, there is significant evidence to support the claim that In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is NOT like that of all U.S household

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Number of vehicle owned                 Number of households

0                                                             20

1                                                              35

2                                                             23

3 or more                                               22

Total ( n )                                               100

so

Null hypothesis           H₀ : In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is like that of all U.S household

Alternative hypothesis Hₐ : In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is NOT like that of all U.S household

Also given that, ∝ = 0.05

Now, we compute the test statistics;

x² = ∑[ ( O[tex]_i[/tex] - E[tex]_i[/tex] ) / E[tex]_i[/tex] ]

where E[tex]_i[/tex] is expected frequency and O[tex]_i[/tex] is observed frequency.

so we make our table for chi square test statistics

No. of                 O[tex]_i[/tex]            P                E[tex]_i[/tex]            (O[tex]_i[/tex] - E[tex]_i[/tex])²             (O[tex]_i[/tex] - E[tex]_i[/tex])²/E[tex]_i[/tex]

Vehicle                                              (n×P)

owned

0                        20         0.087          8.7            127.69                 14.677

1                         35         0.331           33.1            3.61                     0.109

2                        23         0.381           38.1           228.01                 5.985

3 or more          22         0.201          20.1           3.61                      0.180

Total                  100                           100                                        20.951

hence, x² = 20.951

Now, degree of freedom df = k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3

From Chi-Square critical value table; ( right tailed test ) for ∝ = 0.05

[tex]x_{0.05, 3[/tex] = 7.815

Decision Rule

Reject H₀ if x² is greater than xₐ².

Here, the test statistics ( 20.951 ) is greater than the critical value ( 7.815 )

Therefore, we reject H₀ at 0.05 level of significance.

Hence, there is significant evidence to support the claim that In this community, vehicle ownership distribution is NOT like that of all U.S household

Answer:

y=MX+B

Step-by-step explanation:

the 4 you will put it on the y axis and you'll go down 1 since it's negative and 5 times to the right since it's positive

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = -9 (as you know)

Step-by-step explanation:

  [tex]\log_6\dfrac{1}{6}=\dfrac{x}{9}\\\\\log_6{(6^{-1})}=\dfrac{x}{9}\\\\-1=\dfrac{x}{9}\\\\x=(-1)(9)=\boxed{-9}[/tex]

_____

I find it helpful to remember that a logarithm is an exponent.

  [tex]\log_a(a^b)=b[/tex]