The training of a forensic nurse is very specialized, finishing with a degree in both nursing and forensics.
True
False
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its true
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
What is the court paradox?
what is the difference between their there and they´re
Answer:
Their shows ownership,there is a location,and they're is short for they are.
Explanation:
Hope this helped Mark BRAINLIEST!!!
whats a good explanation for military law?
Answer:
Military law is all legal structures that govern military personnel. Topics covered by military cover service members' conduct while in training or on active duty, protections of military spouses, and service members' reentry into civil society when their tours of duty are over.
Does this help?
which of the following stages in the criminal trial process winds up the trial proceedings?
A: opening statement
B: cross-examination
C: closing argument
D: direct examination
Answer:
c closing arguments !!!!!?
Is it law breaking if you go 10 or lower then the speed limit.
giving brainliest
Answer:Fines are $173 for 10 mph over the speed limit, plus an additional $5 for every 1 mph above 10. So, getting pulled over driving 85 in a 65 mph zone will result in a $223 ticket. Austin. Austin's tickets range from $143 for tickets 5 mph or fewer, up to $273 for 26 mph and more over the limit.
Explanation:
brainliest pls
Please help I can’t get a F this quarter
The correct answer is D. To unite the states more fully under one government.
Explanation
This text is a fragment of the United States Constitution created after the victory in the Independence War. This text expresses a summary of the main objective of the Constitution in the establishment of a newly independent country. According to the above, the phrase "to form a more perfect Union" means that all the states have to be united to build a thriving state. So, the correct answer is D. To unite the states more fully under one government.
In Australia, what are the factors that may decide the ‘jurisdiction’ for a particular court?
Answer:
The Court's jurisdiction is broad, covering almost all civil matters arising under Australian federal law and some summary and indictable criminal matters. Central to the Court's civil jurisdiction is s 39B(1A)c of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).This jurisdiction includes cases created by a federal statute, and extends to matters in which a federal issue is properly raised as part of a claim or of a defence and to matters where the subject matter in dispute owes its existence to a federal statute.
The Court has jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act to hear applications for judicial review of decisions by officers of the Commonwealth. Many cases also arise under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) which provides for judicial review of most administrative decisions made under Commonwealth enactments on grounds relating to the legality, rather than the merits, of the decision. The Court also hears appeals on questions of law from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. This jurisdiction falls under the Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights National Practice Area (NPA) which also includes complaints about unlawful discrimination no longer being dealt with by the Australian Human Rights Commission and matters concerning the Australian Constitution.
The Court hears taxation matters on appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. It also exercises a first instance jurisdiction to hear objections to decisions made by the Commissioner of Taxation.
The Court shares first instance jurisdiction with the Supreme Courts of the states and territories in the complex area of intellectual property (copyright, patents, trademarks, designs and circuit layouts). All appeals in these cases, including appeals from the Supreme Courts, are to a full Federal Court.
Jurisdiction
residence;
cause of action;
the place where the dispute arose;
the quantum and nature of the claim;
consent;
location of the property; and.
other factors.
please give me brainliest.
true or false: Chief Justice Earl owen wrote about Miranda’s case for the supreme court
Answer:
True, the Chief Justice delivered the verdict of a 5-4 majority, stating that the defendant's interrogation violated his Fifth Amendment Right..
Explanation:
Chief Justice Earl Owen wrote about Miranda’s case for the supreme court. The statement is True.
What was Supreme Court?The Supreme Court is the highest judiciary body in the country which evaluates whether the laws are practiced properly or not. It helps to check the activities that are unconstitutional in the country and take strict actions against them.
The United States Supreme Court held in the landmark decision of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) that police must tell individuals of their constitutional rights prior to questioning them while they are in custody.
Ernesto Miranda was taken into custody and brought in for interrogation in relation to a kidnapping case in this case. Miranda was not made aware of his access to an attorney or his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.
Learn more about the supreme court, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ2
You should always leave yourself plenty of space between yourself and the vehicle in front of you.
O a) true
Ob) false
Answer:
a) true.......but to an extent u should leave sufficient enough space...the legal spacing would have to be used
If a judge rules that a party has lost its case because of the Statute of Frauds, the judge has essentially stated that: A. the losing party purposely deceived the other party about a material fact. B. the losing party is not allowed to introduce evidence to contradict a written agreement. C. the losing party cannot enforce an oral contract that should have been in writing. D. the losing party was found by the court to have lied, and will therefore lose the case. E. the winning party has proven criminally fraudulent conduct on the part of the losing party.