Please answer this question with two sentences. Ill give brainliest to whoever answers correctly with 2 sentences!

Answer:

d. may agree to a new contract that includes the new price.

Explanation:

A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.

There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implies contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, etc.

Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.

Since the original contract has been completely rescinded (declared void, repealed or annulled), Bistro and Corporate may agree to a new contract that includes the new price based on mutual assent between the two parties.

Answer: People who think that the law is not fair can approach the court to decide on the issue. The court has the power to modify or cancel laws if it finds that they don't adhere to the Constitution.

Answer:

Explanation:

networks

Guided Reading Activity

Economic Systems

Lesson 1 Scarcity and the Science of Economics

Review Questions

Answer:

C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money

Answer:

the answer is true

Explanation:

because the force is greater than that which is needed to compel compliance

Answer:

yes they are helping with the incidences of the bicycles

Explanation:

Answer:

The number of repeats within an STR is referred to as an allele. For instance, the STR known as D7S820, found on chromosome 7, contains between 5 and 16 repeats of GATA. Therefore, there are 12 different alleles possible for the D7S820 STR.

, murder, robbery, assault, kidnapping.

Answer:

1. Embezzlement

2. Domestic Violence

3. Murder

4. Car Theft

5. Extortion

Explanation:

Answer:

no options

Explanation:

Answer:

The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.

A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.

The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.

Explanation:

Answer: A "juvenile" is a person who has not attained his eighteenth birthday, and "juvenile delinquency" is the violation of a law of the United States committed by a person prior to his eighteenth birthday which would have been a crime if committed by an adult.

please give brainlest if this helps!

Answer:

It is C.30 years old

Explanation:

Answer:

D) A contract.. that the obvious because when you do business with anyone you would want to have a contract on deck because people play games and also so if things go wrong you have proof in court.

Answer:

please give me brainlist and follow

Explanation:

The law plays no role in euthanasia if good fortune or good medicine allows such a death. Today, however, euthanasia all too often attracts a second meaning1, an act or omission designed to hasten death and thus relieve the suffering of a dying or incurably sick patient.

Answer:

If this is for edge....it’s A) inner

Explanation:

Answer:

Keisha has the right to be tried in New York under the Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed[.]”

Explanation:

Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her case to be transferred to Georgia because the sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant the right to be represented by an attorney during trial.

The term crime refers to the illegal activity. The crime is not allow to the country, if any person is commit the crime are go the jail. The legal punishable by the state in case of crime. The punishment is set according to the different crime. For example a person is harm another person property.

Keisha has the rights to be tried in New York underneath the Sixth Amendment, which states that "in all criminal proceedings, the accused shall have the right to a prompt and public trial, by an unbiased jury appointed by the state and jurisdiction wherein the crime may have been committed."

As a result, the conclusion of the sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant the right to be represented by an attorney during trial are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on crime, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9997722

#SPJ2

Answer: D. Damian will get a harder sentence because of his background

Explanation:

Radical criminology bases its opinion on the fact that the state uses its power to make laws that will be beneficial to the ruling class while the working class are left out. It simply means that the laws made benefits the rich at the expense of the poor in the society.

Therefore, since Damian was raised in a poverty-stricken city by a single mom while Hunter is the son of a small-town doctor and his socialite wife, Damian will get a harder sentence because of his background.

red lie are lies to harm others

Explanation:

example:

Danice: Mr William Jake took your phone and smashed it on the ground

Mr William: What?

* Then Mr William argued with Jake and scolded him so therefore Danice told a red lie*

Hope it helps

A claim made with full knowledge that the opposing person already knows it to be untrue.

Red lies are just about retaliation and spite. The desire to hurt others, regardless at the cost of one's own harm, drives them. "A brilliant red lie" refers to a complete fabrication or something wholly at variance with the truth. The phrase "a red stranger" is another way we describe an individual who is a complete stranger.

An example of a red lie will is:

Even though you detest the meatloaf, you proclaim to your mother that it is excellent. You do not wish to tell her buddy that she's gained a significant amount of weight and appears heavy, so you respond as she asks saying he doesn't look big in her dress. In this, there is a  red lie that is presented.

Learn more about red lie, here:

https://brainly.com/question/25427223

#SPJ2

Answer:

Criminal law

Explanation:

Answer:

Mindhunter

America's Most Wanted

Criminal: UK

Public administrators play a crucial role in aiding federal agencies, such as the Department of Health and Human Services and the Transportation Security Administration.

On a local level, public administrators organize efforts to improve communications and share data between public safety services

Answer:

A. injury and at the time of the suit.

Explanation:

A corporation can be defined as a corporate organization that has facilities and owns or controls assets used for the production of goods and services in at least one country other than its headquarter (home office) located in its home country.

This ultimately implies that, a corporation is a corporate organization that owns or controls its business in two or more countries.

One of the advantage of a corporation is that, owners have limited liability for debt to the extent to which they have invested and as such are not personally liable for some of the debt owed by corporation.

A derivative suit can be defined as a lawsuit that's brought forward by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation, to either defend or enforce a legal right (claim) against a third party such as a director or executive officer in the corporation.

Hence, to bring a derivative suit to a court of competent jurisdiction, a shareholder must own stock at the time of the injury and at the time of the suit.

Answer:

OB

Explanation:

There is no reason to confiscate them but people in all other options could be doing something, have done, or they are currently doing it. Everything but OB is reasonable.

Answer:

Inductive

Explanation:

Answer:

are various definitions of the term “legal system”. A Legal System is the framework of rules and institutions within a nation regulating individual’s relations with one another and between them and the government.(Book) In this world, there are many types of legal systems, but the few major legal sytems of the world today are civil law, common law, customary law, religious law, socialist and mixed law systems.

Civil law is the dominant legal tradition today in most of Europe, all of Central and South America, parts of Asia and Africa, and even some discrete areas of the common-law world, like Louisiana and Quebec. The origin of civil law is from the Roman law. The civil law is a set out of comprehensive system of rules which are applied and interpreted by judges. Besides that, civil law is older, more widely distributed and in many ways more influential than the common law.

Common law is a system of law that is derived from judges’ decisions, rather than statutes or constitutions. It is based on tradition, past practices and legal precedents set by courts through interpretation of statues, legal legislation, and past rulings.It is english origin and is found in United States and other countries with strong english influences

Customary law is a traditional common rule or practice that has become an intrinsic part of the accepted and expected conduct in a community, profession, or trade and is treated as a legal requirement. Not many countries in the world today will operate under a legal system which could be wholly customary. However, customary law still plays a sometimes significant role, like in the matters of personal conduct, in many countries or political entities with mixed legal systems.

Islamic law is derived from the interpretation of the Koran. Its primary objective is social justice, but also includes property rights, economic decision making, and types of economic freedom. Islamic law is mostly found in Pakistan, Iran, and other Islamic states.

Socialist law is based on fundamental tenets of Marxist-socialist state and center on concept of economic, political, and social policies of the state. It can be found in some independent states of the former Soviet Union, China and other Marxist-socialist states.

A mixed legal system is a mixture of two or more legal system practised by some countries.

2.0 Malaysia’s Legal System

Different country practices different types of legal system. Some country practices one type of legal system while others practices the mixed legal system which means a combination of two or more legal systems. Malaysia for example, practices the mixed legal system which includes the Common Law, Islamic law and Customary Law. Malaysia’s legal system comprises laws which have arise from three significant periods in Malaysian history dating from the Malacca Sultanate, to the spread of Islam to Southeast Asia, and following the absorption into the indigenous culture of British colonial rule which introduced a constitutional government and the common law. Malaysia’s unique legal system is designed to balance the delicate racial and religious needs of its heterogeneous people. The Malaysian legal system law can be classified into two . However, according to the democratic ruling system, the Chief Executive is the Prime Minister. This does not mean that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is unable to voice any opinion, but rather that he must act on government advice, whatever his personal view might be. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints a Cabinet to advise him on country’s matter. The Cabinet consists of the Prime Minister and a number of Ministers who must all be members of Parliament. Besides that, the Government has set up various agencies to ensure the smooth enforcement of the law. It comprised of three main components, namely ministries, departments and statutory bodies.

laws pertaining to persons professing the religion of Islam.

Share this:

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

OSCOLA

APA

MLA

MLA-7

Harvard

Vancouver

Wikipedia

All ltd, 'L

Trustedsite Law

Answer: they ply there important roles as citizens

Explanation: