Answer:
a buy territory from the American indian
Late in World War 1 the Russian Army went home because
A. They went to fight China
B. They had done their part
C. They had a revolution at home to take care of
D. The war had already been decided
Answer: The answer is C. They had a revolution at home to take care of
was slavery a problem for Historian 2
(Freehling)
Explanation:
Historian 2 (Freehling): Believed slavery was a problem. Freehling recognized that blacks & whites were separated, if slavery ended blacks & whites may not be able to live together, so blacks would have to go back to Africa.
is it possible to win war on terror in your opinion? why or why not
Answer:
Yes (Short term) and no (Long Term)
Explanation:
The war on terror can be divided among different terrorist organizations. You can successfully bring down a terrorist organization but that does not mean it will rise again or another one would start. Example: Al-Queda was taken down but now the UN and Middle Eastern countries face ISIS. If the message of Radical-Islamic movements is still present there will be terrorism in the middle-east. Or if Ireland is still being suppressed by Britain the IRA will still stand. Extreme-Anarchists as well in France, Spain, Britain, etc will still use violence to prove a message. The Ku Klux Klan will still use violence and fear to get their way as they advocate white supremacy. All of these terrorists organizations could be brought down but that doesn't promise that they would ever rise again or start another movement.
Which statement accurately describes a key difference between Simón
Bolívar and José de San Martín?
A. San Martín believed in nonviolent resistance to colonial rule, while
Bolívar preferred a violent revolution,
B. Bolívar declared himself emperor of Venezuela, while San Martín
tried to make Venezuela a democracy.
C. San Martín began the liberation of Peru, while Bolívar completed
the liberation of the country.
D. Bolivar fought to preserve Spanish rule over Peru, while San Martín
fought against the Spanish.
Answer:
It is C
Explanation:
The statement that best describes a key difference between Simon Bolivar and Jose de San martin is that San Martin began the liberation of Peru while bolivar completed the liberation of the country. So, C is the correct option.
What do you mean by the statement?A Statement refers to the group of words or phrases that includes main and subordinate clauses.
The statement that best describes the key difference between Simon Bolivar and Jose de San Martin is that San martin began the liberation of Peru while Bolivar completed the liberation of the country.
Therefore, C is the correct option.
Learn more about the statement here:
https://brainly.com/question/2285414
#SPJ2
os
Give two things you can infer from Source A about the League of Nations.
(4 Points)
THE FLOWER
Source A: A political cartoon produced by British
cartoonist David Low. It appeared in the Star
Magazine on 11th November 1919.
Answer:
The League of Nations is an angel. This angel connotes peace meaning the League of Nations is a divine bringer of peace to the world.
The League of Nations is a flower and flowers are pretty things. So peace is a pretty thing. Meaning the League of Nations is a beautiful thing.
The flower is growing in a graveyard. The League was one result of the First World War. Meaning the soldiers did not die in vain.
Squalor caused disease to spread because...
1. Few houses had inside baths or _____ Many people hardly ever washed.
2. There was no proper sanitation. _____ was just dumped in the streets.
3. Rooms were badly ventilated, especially those in
_____ dwellings.
4. Rubbish in the street encouraged _____
5. Drinking _____ was often contaminated.
6. Houses were often damp and in poor repair, with floors of _____ earth
Word Options:
sewage
earth
toilets
water
vermin
cellar
bare
hi are you on ig the say me your id I will add you t
Why did Stalin kill a total of 18 million people?
Answer:he was a very angry man that hated Jewish people:) hope I helped
Explanation:
What court cases helped promote integration in Oklahoma?
Select all that apply.
O . Plessy v. Ferguson
O . Gary v. State of Oklahoma
O . Sipuel v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma
O . McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents for Higher Education
O . Brown v. Board of Education v.
Answer:
Explanation:
Gary v. State of Oklahoma.
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma.
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education
Explanation:
How were the governments of Sparta and Athens similar?
They were both run by men.
They were both run by kings.
They were both run by the elders.
They were both run by the people.
Answer:
d) They were both run by the people
"One of the main ways they were similar was in their form of government. Both Athens and Sparta had an Assembly, whose members were elected by the people. Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by archons, who were elected annually."
Answer:
A) They were both run by men.
Explanation:
plz plz plz plz HELPPPPPPPPPPPPP 30 p
Answer:
100.0%
Explanation:
how did american society respond to the new woman of the 1920s
Answer:
Significant changes for women took place in politics, the home, the workplace, and in education. ... When passed in 1920, the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote. Surprisingly, some women didn't want the vote. A widespread attitude was that women's roles and men's roles did not overlap.
Hope this helps....have an amazing day my friend ^_^
What issues did the Roman Republic face that led to its demise?
Answer:
Most of there army was killed and they had sickness
Explanation:
Answer:
Internal turmoil in 133 BC by economic stagnation in the city of Rome , slave revolts without, and dissension in the military precipitated a period of unrelenting political known as the Roman Revolution, the Late Roman Republic , or the Fall of the Republic, 133-27 BC......
I hope it is helpful.....
Can't read my,
Can't read my
Finish it easy peesy lemon squeezy
if yall get this wrong no brainliest
Answer:
Wheres the question-
Explanation:
What was one result of both the French Revolution and the American Revolution?
Answer:
The first ten amendments of the US constitution. These include our freedoms and rights. Both want a change from being ruled by an absolute ruler, both have economic instability from war debt, both have social inequality. And also, both started because of enlightenment ideas.
hope that this helps.
Explanation:
Answer: increased political influence of the middle class
Explanation:
middle class was a majority of the population but they were highly taxed and treated very unequally. the whole revolution was based on enlightenment ideas and they (third estate and Americans) were fighting for rights as well
PLZ HELP. Would you agree with the Laissez Faire Philosophy or the Utilitarian Philosophy?
Answer:
i would agree with the utilitarian philosophy
Explanation:
What is the effect of railroads
What would have been the potential impact if the putsch had succeeded?
Answer:
The Putsch was a badly organised fiasco which was easily put down and showed how weak the Nazis were. The Putsch was a success for the Nazis as it put them on the national map and made Hitler famous.
Explanation:
I hope I helped
what were two
effects of the development of the West on
Native American Indians?
Answer: These tribes suffered greatly as the United States government took more and more land. Nomadic tribes suffered as well. They had to leave the rivers, forests, and mountains and move to a very different topography. At first, the native tribes were given a choice of sorts.
Explanation: Hope this helps
what atrocities were committed by the Axis and Allies during WW2
Answer:
Explanation:
For the allies, think Dresden. There was absolutely no reason that Dresden should have been bombed. Thousands died by either suffocation or burning to death.
For Axis, mostly Germany, it begins and ends with the Holocaust.
2^x=128
I find it peculiar how people use brainIy like it's social media or they ask questions like "how to be a rapper" when you can easily get the answer off of googIe
The excerpt below was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the decision of Schenck v. United States (1919).
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shounting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.... The question in everycase is whether the words used are used in such curcumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that congress has a right to prevent.
Which conduct did the U.S Supreme Court determine was a “clear and present danger” in this case?
demonstrations in which protestors burned American flags
newspaper articles criticizing U.S. entry into the war
the presence of Japanese Americans on the West Coast
the mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft
Answer: The mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft
Explanation:
As much as every American is entitled to freedom of speech by the First Commandment, according to the case of Schenck v. United States (1919), that does not apply when the words spoken created a clear and present danger.
This is what the defendants in the case had done when they mailed pamphlets to young men urging them to resist a draft into the U.S. army even though the Americans were now at war with Germany in the first World War.
Read the body paragraph from an argumentative essay on Louisiana’s economy.
1) Some may say that the state’s economy is not growing as fast as it should. 2) However, people who believe that are crazy. 3) There has been an increase in jobs in the private sector in recent years. 4) Also, the income level for Louisiana’s workers has improved across the state.
What would be the best way to revise sentence 2?
Change it to a more gental tone.
Add a transition to connect the ideas.
Fix the spelling and punctuation errors.
Add vivid imagery or descriptive details.
Answer: However people who believe that, have their own opinions.
Hope this helps!!
I'm sorry if it wasn't good enough. :'(
A. change it to a more respectful/gentle tone.
Jonas was the father of Peter and
Answer:
their are many people named Jonas
give some context to what the question is asking about
Diferencias e implicaciones culturales que experimentan las gerencias de las organizaciones sin fronteras.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Aunque no anexaste opciones o incisos para responder a esta pregunta, podemos ayudarte a responder lo siguiente.
Las diferencias e implicaciones culturales que experimentan las gerencias de las organizaciones sin fronteras son las siguientes.
Cada país tiene su propia cultura, tradiciones, estilos de vida y sistemas de creencias. Y esas son precisamente las diferencias e implicaciones culturales que experimentan las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales o Asociaciones Civiles internacionales conocidas como "Sin Fronteras" que se dedican a ayudar a las personas y a defender algunas causas que consideran injustas en diferentes países del mundo.
Estas organizaciones no son tan bien aceptadas en todo el mundo precisamente por esas diferencias culturales y diferentes sistemas de gobierno que pueden no ser tan democráticos.
please help will give brainlist
Answer:
1) Civil liberties were promoted
Explanation:
i don't know the answer im just guessing.... i'm just trying to help.
Name the two (2) things that give
local government its powers
Please help
Brainiest answer to whoever is first
General Lucius D. Clay contributed to Georgia’s transportation system by
ordering that Savannah’s port be improved.
helping plan the interstate highway system.
taking charge of the state’s railroads during World War II.
presiding over the opening of Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.
Answer:
helping plan the interstate highway system.
Explanation:
Took the quiz : ) <33
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
John Adams was a Federalist. Why was his son a member of
the National Republican party?
I’ll give you Brainly
Answer:
because he can have his own opinions on politics and his own ideas!!! :/
Who should have the power to make decisions in a society?
Answer:
The people of the nation should have the power to make that decision due to the fact that the leaders don't know everyone's struggle and that not everyone is being heard.
Las problemáticas de los siglos XX y XXI en México han generado conflictos sociales entre los propios individuos de la sociedad, pues esto ocasiona que se rompa el tejido social. ¿Cuáles son esos problemas?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Las problemáticas de los siglos XX y XXI en México han generado conflictos sociales entre los propios individuos de la sociedad, pues esto ocasiona que se rompa el tejido social. ¿Cuáles son esos problemas?
A lo largo de esos dos siglos, México ha sufrido una serie de sucesos y acontecimientos que lo han marcado hasta el día de hoy.
Después del movimiento de Independencia que culmina con la entrada victoriosa del ejército Trigarante con Agustín de Iturbide al frente, México tuvo los clásicos problemas que tienen lo nuevos países independientes. Un vacío de poder, pugnas internas entre diversas facciones que buscan sus propios intereses, y un descuido por atender las verdaderas necesidades de la población, entre ellos, la de los indígenas.
Con la llegada al poder de Benito Juárez se instituyen una serie de Reformas que buscan modernizar la vida del país, pero el proceso no fue fácil.
Vendría un segundo movimiento que causaría mucha pena y dolor en México. Después de más de 30 años en el poder, la Revolución Mexicana saca al dictador Porfirio Díaz y se vuelve a confrontar el país en otra guerra nacional. Figuras como Pancho Villa, Emiliano Zapata, Venustiano Carranza y otros, luchan por devolver la justicia a los pobres.
Después de la Revolución, la pobreza y la desigualdad se mantuvieron. Y hubo una tercera confrontación, la guerra Cristera.
El cacicazgo del Partido Nacional Revolucionario que posteriormente se convertiría en Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) empobreció más al país por medio del control de los sindicatos y las organizaciones populares.
Aunado a eso, la política liberal impuesta desde la época del Presidente Miguel de la Madrid en 1982, y consolidada por el Presidente Carlos Salinas, llevaron a México a la desigualdad total y la pobreza del campesino y el trabajador Mexicano.
Por esa razón llega al poder el Presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrado, quien trata de implementa una política social más justa, a pesar de que sus rivales de la Derecha le obstaculizan todas sus propuestas.
La realidad es que su popularidad crece un la mayoría de Mexicanos confía en lo que está haciendo.